First of all, what do we mean when we speak of evolution?
I think there are different interpretations and understandings.
1) Microevolution: A species evolves within
itself, generation by generation, through genetic mutations, etc.
2) Common descent: All species descended from a
single primitive organism
3) Darwinian evolution: All species arise and
develop through natural selection (“survival of the fittest”). Therefore, from
one species, another distinct species can develop.
4) Spontaneous generation: The descent of living
matter from nonliving matter
Correct me
if I’m missing or misinterpreting some of these. It seems there is some
overlap.
In the last
blog, we explored St. Thomas Aquinas’ proofs for the existence of God. For
those who believe in God, theories of evolution only pose a problem insofar as
they seek to disprove the need for a Creator. Christianity is not incompatible
with these theories of evolution, if science provides adequate justification
for their acceptance. Faith and reason are not at all opposed.
After all,
Aquinas also said, "The potency of a cause is the greater, the
more remote the effects to which it extends" (Summa c. Gent., III, c. lxxvi). Could God make use of
evolution to accomplish His Will? Yes. Can evolutionary theories make room for
God? That is the question.
Most of us
would agree that organisms change over time, within their own species. We can
name examples of #1: pests evolve to be resistant to pesticides; animals may
gradually change color through generations to adapt to environmental factors,
etc. No problem.
Most people don't even make a stink when there is mention of one plant or animal species evolving from another. But when it comes to the genesis of
man, there is concern. And rightly so, for evolutionary theories are inadequate in accounting for the origin of the soul
of man.
Does man have a soul?
Webster’s dictionary defines soul
in the following way: “the immaterial essence, animating principle, or actuating cause of an
individual life.” By that definition,
man, and even animals and plants have a “soul” – some sort of life force.
Does man have a
spiritual soul?
This may sound redundant, as “spirit” and “soul” are sometimes used
interchangeably. But by “spiritual”, I am referring to the sacred,
supernatural, religious or moral. Man is a spiritual being. In every
civilization, man has had some sort of religious practice or belief. He builds
churches and temples and synagogues, tries to interpret the placement of the
stars, hails the glory of nature, consults seers and prophets and mediums and
healers. And he is the only being I have ever encountered that holds dialogues
and publishes papers and writes music, etc. about things like love, justice,
truth, right and wrong. Goodness! Morality? Religion?! Where do these ideas
come from? If man were a purely material being, would he not be limiting his
discussions to things like food and housing and how to get to across town in
the quickest amount of time? To be able to conceive an immaterial idea like
right and wrong, one has to have the immaterial faculty capable of doing so. Something
purely material cannot generate something purely spiritual. Therefore, man must
have a spiritual faculty capable of forming spiritual ideas, and this faculty
must come from a spiritual substance, which is his soul.
If man is the descendent of some other
organism, can we also say that that organism also has a soul of the same kind
as man?
If apes could speak, would they
also converse about truth, goodness and beauty? Have you ever witnessed a dog
building a shrine?
If man’s soul is distinct, when and how did he
come to possess it?
Something wholly spiritual cannot evolve from something wholly material. Evolution may be responsible for the creation of complex organisms, but it cannot be responsible for the generation of spiritual ideas. It cannot be responsible for the creation of a human soul. For that, we need the direct action of a Creator, one who is of Spirit.
Something wholly spiritual cannot evolve from something wholly material. Evolution may be responsible for the creation of complex organisms, but it cannot be responsible for the generation of spiritual ideas. It cannot be responsible for the creation of a human soul. For that, we need the direct action of a Creator, one who is of Spirit.
"If the human body takes its origin
from pre-existent living matter, the spiritual soul is immediately created by
God."
– Pope John Paul II, in his 1996 Address to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences
"Every spiritual soul is created immediately by God." – Catechism of the Catholic Church #366
– Pope John Paul II, in his 1996 Address to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences
"Every spiritual soul is created immediately by God." – Catechism of the Catholic Church #366
No comments:
Post a Comment